In King V. Lane, what is said about unrecorded plats?

In King V. Lane, it is established that unrecorded plats can still serve as legal conveyances. This implies that even if a plat has not been officially recorded, it can still convey property rights and interests as long as there is sufficient evidence and intent to do so. This principle recognizes the legal validity of informal agreements and maps that can demonstrate a landowner's intent to convey property, thus ensuring that parties involved can rely on such documents despite their lack of formal recording.

The concept of the validity of unrecorded plats is crucial in real estate law, primarily because it acknowledges that conveyances can occur without the necessity of recording, as long as the intent and rightful ownership can be demonstrated. This allows for flexibility in property transactions, particularly in situations where recording may have been overlooked due to various reasons.

The other options present concepts that do not align with the ruling in this case. For example, the assertion that unrecorded plats are invalid unless recorded would overlook the legal avenues through which unrecorded plats can still function. Moreover, the requirement that plats must be updated every decade does not reflect any legal stipulation related to the maintenance of unrecorded plats. Lastly, claiming that failure to record a plat nullifies the deed does not