Which type of easement is imposed by a court to resolve a conflict, such as access for a land-locked property?

The correct choice pertains to an easement that arises out of necessity, often imposed by a court to address situations where a property is landlocked and lacks direct access to a public road or thoroughfare. This type of easement ensures that the landlocked property owner can reach their property by providing a legal means of access over a neighboring parcel.

Easements by implication or necessity typically arise in scenarios where, at the time of property division, the need for access was apparent and essential for the reasonable use of the land. The court recognizes this necessity and grants an easement to protect the rights of the property owner who would otherwise be unable to access their land.

In contrast, easements by express grant or reservation are established through explicit agreements between parties, detailing the rights and conditions of use. A permanent easement is a broader term that refers to the long-lasting nature of an easement but does not specifically address the circumstances of necessity or conflict resolution that are typical of a court-imposed easement. The special nature of easements by necessity directly ties back to the need to resolve conflicts regarding land access, which is why this option is the appropriate choice in this context.